Guess who’s coming to dinner

by Barbara Miller

Whoever was in charge of protecting the Obamas at their first state dinner made several mistakes, including what might be called reverse profiling. A striking blond, white woman in a glittering red and gold lehenga-style sari, along with her appropriately dressed male escort, sashayed her way into the White House on November 25th. She vamped for a photo with some Marines and got up close and smiley with Rahm Emanuel and Vice President Biden. A photo of her in the receiving line with President Obama shows her holding his outstretched hand in both of hers.

Michaele Salahi looked and acted the part of someone who might be invited to the event. But she and her husband are frauds, opportunists, aspiring reality tv stars, and…trespassers.

Cultural anthropologists and other social scientists have expressed concerns about racial and ethnic profiling, especially since the 9/11 events in the US. The Henry Louis Gates incident in July brought a flare-up of commentary.

Racial/ethnic profiling seeks to pinpoint people who are dangerous to society, who have evil intent, who plan to violate the law. It is crude and its effectiveness is debatable.  One problem with racial/ethnic profiling is that it steers the gaze of security people toward certain types of people and, thus, necessarily away from other types of people who are deemed of less concern.

So an attractive, glittering blond woman gets to shake the president’s hand. It is totally improbable to think that a similarly attractive blond woman wearing a burqa could have crashed the state dinner party. No way.  She would have been profiled, questioned, and perhaps detained at the first checkpoint.

What’s the lesson here? Attractive, appropriately dressed white people who aspire to be on reality tv should be carefully watched as they could have bad intentions.

Picture adapted from a photo from the CBC.

Sexism, racism, and death in Second Life

Virtual worlds research can provide insights into important social questions such as racism and ethnic discrimination. An exploratory study of a “Muslim” avatar in Second Life provides intriguing findings that beg for more in-depth research.

Methal Mohammed teaches English as a second language in the Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture at Texas A&M University. She first came to the US as a Fulbright Scholar from Baghdad, Iraq. As part of a class in visual culture, she created a Second Life (SL) personal avatar, “noorelhuda Beb”. “Noorelhuda” first dressed in long trousers, a long sleeved shirt and white shoes. She had “basic” features and long brown hair. She teleported to several sites to make friends but spent most of her time sitting alone.

The researcher decided to add a hijab (headscarf) to her avatar. Noorelhuda with her hijab then set out to a variety of sites to meet other avatars using the question, “I am new here, can you please help me?” Avatars she met either commented briefly or turned away and kept going.

A handful of vignettes from noorelhuda’s visits reveal that she was making some progress establishing contacts and engaging in constructive conversations related to her hijab and its cultural meaning. Things were going well until noorelhuda decided to revisit an earlier site: a beach resort where other avatars were sunbathing or dancing. She was approached by a male avatar policeman who pushed her into the sea where she drowned. She was “killed.”

This brief study connects to many questions about what SL interactions reveal about Real Life (RL) including racism, sexism, exclusion, appearance-based judgments, and aggression. It also raises the issue of research ethics: in cultural anthropology, it is unethical to carry out undercover research. One has to inform research participants about the goals of the research and protect their anonymity. “Informed consent” is thus an important guideline, but it has the downside of preventing anthropologists from doing research in “natural” situations where actors are not influenced by knowing that their words, thoughts, and behaviors are being observed and recorded.

Research in SL necessarily protects the anonymity of “research participants.” So is it okay for someone like “noorelhuda” to conduct “under cover” research in SL? If she had told people that she was visiting sites and trying to meet people as part of a research project, would her experiences have been different? Would people have been more interested in talking with her, or the opposite? Would people displayed less racism? Would the policeman have “killed” her?

Photo, “A Muslim lady in SL”, from Flickr and Creative Commons.

DIY development aid

From Bono to a college student who takes an alternative spring break to help people living in poverty, interest and participation in development-related activities has increased among non-specialists in the past decade. Philanthropists, students at many levels, and people in business, professional groups, and migrants’ associations now constitute a fourth pillar of development alongside the traditional three pillars of bilateral aid, multilateral aid, and NGOs. Patrick Develtere and Tom De Bruyn discuss the fourth pillar drawing on their experiences and research in Belgium. They point out that the fourth pillar is often neglected in the development discourse and their potential impact and contributions go uncounted in the overall development picture.

The authors are optimistic about the potential of the emerging fourth pillar in helping the poor: “There are large numbers of young graduates applying in vain for jobs with traditional development organizations, as well as people who want to do more than give or collect money during NGO fundraising campaigns.  The alternative often lies in starting up a project of one’s own, or joining a fourth-pillar organization that celebrates modern volunteering.” They also see potential in reshaping longstanding patterns of development thinking and replacing development jargon (mechanisms of participation, gender sensitivity, outcome mapping) with a “concrete story of co-operation, told by a few faces and many pictures on the Internet.”

An example of a development organization launched just a few years ago by a former student of mine is Adam Carter’s Cause and Affect Foundation. Adam earned an MA from the Elliott School of International Affairs and took classes on development (including The Anthropology of Development from me), so he did have some academic background. His achievements go far beyond what he learned in college, however, and I am happy to have contributed in a small way to the fourth pillar of development through Adam’s work.

Photo, “Bono & Bob Geldof”, from Flickr and Creative Commons.

CIGA event today at GW

For those readers in the D.C. area, please join us for the final Culture in Global Affairs program talk of the year.

Sharia and Gender

in the Malay-Muslim Corporate Workplace

Patricia Sloane-White, Assistant Professor of Anthropology, University of Delaware

This talk will explore how in Malaysia, the growing muscularity and masculinity of sharia (Islamic law) in personal and domestic settings has been reproduced as corporate policy in many Malaysian companies. What Sloane-White calls “personnel sharia” increasingly defines and regulates Muslim women’s positionality and vulnerability vis-à-vis men in the Malaysian corporate workplace, providing insight into how Malay-Muslim women’s corporate roles are being reconfigured in an increasingly sharia-ized Malaysia.

November 20 – 12 noon – 1957 E Street NW, Room 211

RSVP: ghcornwell@gmail.com

Lost in Yemen

by Barbara Miller

The lead article in the International section of the Sunday New York Times was entitled “Thirsty Plant Steals Water in Yemen–Farmers Grow Narcotic: Drought Fuels Conflict.” Lots to attract readers from environmental concerns to drugs and conflict. Three photographs add to the grab. One small image shows qat leaves. A very large image is of a lone Yemeni man standing in a dry and drab scene. A third showings a qat vendor and a customer. An inset map shows how close Yemen is to Somalia, another country in the not-good news.

What about the text of the article? It’s a rambling account that flings causes around like candies from a busted piñata:

–The country’s scarce water is used to feed an addiction
–Drought is killing off Yemen’s food crops so farmers turn to planting qat trees
–The water table is sinking
–Yemen’s poverty and lawlessness make the water problem more severe
–Qat trees are proliferating
–Lack of water is fueling tribal conflicts and insurgencies
–Climate change is deepening the problem
–At the root of the water crisis is rapid population growth
–The Yemeni government supports qat despite its destructive elements
–There is no coordination within the government

The article is little more than a laundry list. It offers no sense of order about the most basic, underlying causes versus intermediate causes or simply correlates. Such writing would not be acceptable to me in an undergraduate term paper.

I know that journalists, in contrast to academic social scientists, are supposed to write in a nonlinear, engaging, conversational style. Which apparently precludes logic and clarity. What does the casual reader take away from this article?  That Yemenis are intoxicated, lawless, and constantly having babies?

I do thank the writer for providing some important material three-quarters of the way in:

“For milleniums, Yemen preserved traditions of careful water use. Farmers depended mostly on rainwater collection and shallow wells. In some areas they built dams…But traditional agriculture began to fall apart in the 1960s after Yemen was flooded with cheap foreign grain, which put many farmers out of business. Qat began replacing food crops. and in the late 1960s, motorized drills began to proliferate…”

The rest of the article, however, makes nothing of this information, instead mentioning the government’s irresponsibility and lack of coordination.

I am intrigued by what happened in the 1960s: do any readers know about who supplied the “cheap foreign grain”? What about possible outside influences in earlier times? And is anyone in Yemen, including the World Bank, working to revitalize traditional patterns of water management which are likely to prove more successful than exogenously designed and imposed projects?

Photo, “Khat”, from Flickr via Creative Commons.

Anthro in the news 11/2/09

• The recession and polygyny: lessons from Inner Asia?

In Russia, there are 9 million fewer men than women. The “man shortage” is created by war, alcoholism and economic migration. The Guardian highlighted research on this topic by cultural anthropologist Caroline Humphrey, Sigrid Rausing professor of collaborative anthropology at Cambridge University, and the New York Times gave it a shoutout in its Sunday “Week in Review” section.  For details see the upcoming post on this blog.

• Walking the walk on Wall Street

Economix gave a nod to Karen Ho, associate professor of anthropology at the University of Minnesota, for her ethnography of Wall Street which exposes Wall Street culture’s transience, constant turnover, uncertainty and risk-taking. Ho argues that these characteristics helped precipitate the current crisis.

• Ur: human sacrifice upside the head

The New York Times covered findings by archaeologists at the University of Pennsylvania that shows that palace attendants who were killed to accompany a royal burial in Ur, Iraq, likely suffered a grisly end. The usual explanation of the many deaths of warriors, handmaidens, and others, is that they were marched down into the burial chambers where they drank poison and then died. Their bodies were arranged with elaborate headdresses for the women and weapons by the side of the warriors.

But one thing was missing: their skulls. Most had been smashed flat from the weight of the earth over the centuries (these burials are from a 4,500 year-old cemetery).

Janet Monge, biological anthropologist at Penn, has led a team of researchers who apply forensic analysis to determine probable cause of death. The first CT scans of two skulls reveal that a sharp instrument, such as a pike, was driven through their heads leaving a round hole in the cranium (one hole in the female cranium and two in the male cranium), with cracks radiating from it. Death would have been almost immediate.

So why choose a career as handmaiden or soldier? Monge replies that these positions held great honor and meant a good life at court. And “the movement into the next world was not for them necessarily something to fear.”

• Religious syncretism in Venezuela

Wade Glenn, doctoral student in the Anthropology Department at Tulane University, is quoted in a New York Times article on Venezuelan religious practices that blend elements from indigenous beliefs, Catholicism, West African religions, and other elements such as Nordic myths. As many as 30 percent of Venezuela’s population take part in rituals that involve purifications in a river, drumming, fire dancing, trance, and possession. Glenn’s doctoral research is on this topic.

• Economic inequality, explained

Science Daily reported on an article in Science by anthropologist Monique Borgerhoff  Mulder, professor of anthropology at UC Davis and co-author economist Samuel Bowles of the Santa Fe Institute. They led a team of 24 researchers who analyzed cross-cultural data on economic inequality and inherited wealth in societies around the world. They divide wealth into three categories: material, embodied and relational. Their findings suggest that intergenerational transmission of wealth and wealth inequality is substantial in agricultural and pastoralist societies but not in foraging and horticultural societies. They posit that differences in livelihood technology, institutions, and economic norms account for the difference.

Cultural anthropologists need to unpack and critique these highly generalized findings. Some of the conclusions don’t merit attention (“the four ethnographic systems…differ in the importance if the three classes of wealth”) but others do. Cultural anthropologists have long known, and taught our students, in a form of intergenerational  transfer, that the four modes of livelihood differ in key respects, and we also include attention to a fifth: industrialism/informatics.

Borgerhoff Mulder et al. have done a service in drawing attention to intergenerational transfer of “wealth.” But they are missing some key factors such as the importance of private property versus communal property and use rights (which are also passed down) and cultural knowledge of the environment including the weather, plants and animals, and the spiritual world.

• Feeling the burn

Go to NPR for a discussion of running research including Dan Lieberman, professor of biological anthropology at Harvard University.

• Leadership in the genes

Science Daily picked up an article published in Current Biology on “The Origins and Evolution of Leadership.” The argument is that factors such as age, sex, height, and weight played a major role in the choice of leaders in our evolutionary past and therefore continue to do so today. The underlying hypothesis appears to be that war was a dominating factor in human evolution and that war favors mature males who are tall and solid. This blogger believes that the war factor is overrated for the human evolutionary past by a long shot.

• Neanderthals and modern humans had sex?

It must be the word “sex” that helped move into the mainstream media a claim by evolutionary anthropologist Svante Pääbo that sex occurred between the Neanderthal and modern humans. He shared his conviction, at a conference in Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, near New York City, that Neanderthals and modern humans had sex. But he is not sure how “productive” it was.

CIGA Event Tomorrow at GW

As part of the continuing Culture in Global Affairs program at the Elliott School, please join us for a talk tomorrow with Dr. Frances Norwood of the Inclusion Research Institute.

Euthanasia, Social Death and U.S. Health Care Reform: Policy Lessons from The Netherlands

Friday, October 30, 12 pm – 1:30 pm
1957 E Street NW, Room 505

Frances Norwood, Director of Research, Inclusion Research Institute

Dr. Norwood is a medical anthropologist. Her talk is based on extensive fieldwork in The Netherlands which led to a book called The Maintenance of Life: Preventing Social Death through Euthanasia Talk and End-of-Life Care–Lessons from The Netherlands (Carolina Academic Press, 2009). Dr. Norwood will discuss her findings about end-of-life care in The Netherlands and implications for U.S. health care reform.

Please send RSVP to: Graham Hough-Cornwell at ghcornwell@gmail.com

Anthro in the news 10/19/09

• Social networking vs. social class in England?

People who do not embrace the web will be increasingly cut off from its professional and financial benefits, warns David Zeitlyn, a social (cultural) anthropologist at the University of Kent, England, thus leading to an ever larger digital divide in England. The country’s poorer North East is the region with the highest percentage of people who are not engaging with the internet. Nearly one-third of the people in the North East are reluctant to use the internet for more than sending email and occasional browsing. London and the North West are leading England’s digital revolution with only 19 percent of the population defining themselves as technophobes.

Zeitlyn’s findings are based on his analysis of the “Digital Anthropology” poll of 2,000 web users. He sees class structure as fast-changing in England with a digital elite emerging and thriving and social networking overtaking traditional social class indicators (parents’ social and economic status and education) in shaping a person’s life status.

• Anthropologist is interim Prime Minister of Madagascar

Madagascar’s four main political groups agreed to a power-sharing deal and the appointment of Eugène Mangalaza, an anthropology professor, as Prime Minister of the interim government. Mangalaza has taught anthropology and philosophy at the University of Toamasina. As someone fairly unknown in political circles, he was a surprise choice. Elections will be held in the next six months.

• British economist puts anthropology in its place

Noted British economist and Financial Times columnist John Kay has this to say about the relationship between economics and other disciplines: “Economics is not so much the queen of the social sciences but the servant, and needs to base itself on anthropology, psychology, and the sociology of ideas. The future of investing–and economics–lies in that more eclectic vision.”

• Gusterson skeptical of the Minerva Initiative awards

The Chronicle for Higher Education carried an article entitled “New Pentagon-NSF Grants Draw Criticism from Social Scientists” in which it cited Hugh Gusterson as “one of the most prominent skeptics” of the Minerva Initiative. The Pentagon has funded, so far, 17 projects that were solicited and reviewed by the National Science Foundation under a “special agreement” with the Pentagon that has provided, so far, $7.6 million. Awardees include 13 political scientists, five economists, three sociologists, two psychologists, two computer scientists, one linguist, and one communications scholar (several of the 17 awards have more than one principle investigator). Craig Calhoun, president of the US Social Science Research Council expressed concern about the narrowness of the projects in terms of their focus on “quasi-universal models” and reliance on techniques that are ungrounded in terms of particular country or region. He pointed to the lack of knowledge based on anthropology and fieldwork. Hugh Gusterson agrees: “The people one could think of who might really be able to give Pentagon thinking a jolt and explain how things look from the point of view of disaffected people in the Middle East–I just don’t see them here.”

Anthro in the News 10/5/09

• One very expensive lady

Front-page articles in many newspapers and other outlets, including the New York Times and the Washington Post, heralded the long-awaited publication of research findings about “Ardi,” a 4.4 million year old hominin fossil discovered in Aramis, Ethiopia in 1992-1993 and preliminarily described in 1994. Tim White, paleontologist and Professor of Integrative Biology at the University of California, discovered the first fossil evidence of Ardipithecus ramidus and has headed a comprehensive research project in the area since then to accumulate more fossil and contextual evidence. He is the lead author or a contributing author of 11 papers  about Ardi published in a special issue of Science. The impressive scope of the articles, from botany and other aspects of the habitat to discussion of her (the researchers seem confident of Ardi’s gender) skull, teeth, forelimbs, and locomotion, may help explain the very long time that it took for these reports to appear. The “public” in the US may be little aware that their tax dollars funded most of the research (8 grants from the National Science Foundation), and they likely have not been waiting with baited breath for the findings, though many paleoanthropologists have been. I hope the public will appreciate the importance of the studies and do not fall into the trap of believing wacko headlines on the Internet about how Ardi “proves that man is not descended from apes.” White et al. owe it to the public to get the message out widely and soon.

• Banking on ethnography

An ethnography of Wall Street banking is touted as required reading for business students by the capital markets editor of the Financial Times, Gillian Tett. Tett, who earned a PhD in social anthropology before becoming a journalist,  reviewed Karen Ho’s book, Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street in the FT. Tett admits to being embarrassed when bankers asked her about her academic past because they  considered anthropology to be “hippy” and lacking the status of economics and other “hard” sciences. “Not anymore” she says, since the economic crisis, which has shaken bankers’ faith in their economic models and demonstrated the need for a grasp of “cultural dynamics” in understanding how finance works. I hope she’s right. I haven’t witnessed much shaken faith on this side of the Atlantic. Turning to Liquidated: the author, Karen Ho teaches in the Anthropology Department at the University of Minnesota. Before becoming an anthropology professor, she was a banker with a Wall Street giant. Her fieldwork reveals the “habitus” (from Pierre Bourdieu) of bankers and shows how bankers’ rhetoric of “shareholder values” and “free market capitalism” appears to them as “truth” but is actually part of a system full of contradictions and, overall, delusion.  Tett closes her review by saying, “I, for one, would vote that Ho’s account becomes mandatory reading on any MBA (or investment banking course).”

• Cooking is hot

Possibly the most reviewed anthropology book of 2009 is Richard Wrangham’s popular account of the role of cooking in human evolution, Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human. by Richard Wrangham. In the latest of a spate of reviews,   FT writer Harry Eyres tells how he is totally won over by the book, joining the ranks of other  writers in the “mainstream media” who all seem to love the book. Wrangham, who is professor of biological anthropology at Harvard University, has found a hot topic and produced a readable account of it for nonspecialists.  As a strong non-fan of Wrangham’s earlier popular book (with Dale Peterson), Demonic Males, I am, however, trying to read Catching Fire with an open mind. So far, I am finding his evidence for the role of cooking in making us human more convincing than his evidence for a shared heritage with chimpanzees in explaining male violence.

• Anthropology of footwear

An essay in the Wall Street Journal’s livemit.com cites a 2008 study by Erik Trinkaus, professor of physical anthropology at Washington University in St. Louis, about the first “supportive footwear.” Anatomical evidence from the middle Upper Paleolithic in Europe indicates that the bones of little toes became much less strongly built during that period. This change suggests that human ancestors of the time were wearing some kind of supportive footwear. This research throws into question the claim that running barefoot is the most adaptive way for go, as is argued in Christopher McDougall’s controversial bestseller, Born to Run (see a related posting earlier in this blog).

[For more information, see Erik Trinkaus, Anatomical Evidence for Antiquity of Human Footwear Use” Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1515-1526, 2005.]

The Tiwi are robbed again

If there were a Hall of Fame for the Most Cruel Colonizers of the World, Australia would have a prominent place. Early British settlers (“unsettlers” or displacers, more accurately) hunted the Tasmanians to near-extinction. None of the indigenous groups have been left unscathed. And today the cruelty  continues in new, more “civilized” guises such as economic development.

Editorialist Verlyn Klinkenberg reports on his findings from a recent visit to Melville Island, off the coast of the Northern Territory.  With neighboring Bathhurst Island, it makes up the Tiwi Islands, original home of the Tiwi people.  As his small plane flies over the island, he can see a 75,000 acre plantation of acacia trees.  It is a forestry project run by Great Southern Plantations, a company based in Perth. Acacia trees grow quickly and provide wood chops for the paper industry. The plantation was built on aboriginal reserves, in collaboration the Tiwi Land Council representing Tiwi “traditional owners.”  The goal was to create 300 jobs for Tiwi Islanders and lay the foundation for an enduring forest industry.

However, the company collapsed in May and the project is in receivership. Instead of the anticipated jobs and  income stream, there is desolation and increasing mistrust of Great Southern, the Northern Territory government, and the Tiwi Land Council.

Many Tiwi regret the clearing of the forest and many feel a sense of being robbed of their entitlements once again. They tried in good faith to work with outsiders to pursue economic goals that would help them maintain their self-determination. What seemed like a good investment was instead a high-risk gamble, and the Tiwi lost.

Somebody, however, made big money when the forest was cleared for the plantation. Moreover, the failed acacia plantation is not the only development disaster that has been foisted on the Tiwi Islands.

See some related blog commentary here.

Photo, “Changing Seasons”, of Australian acacia trees from Flickr via Creative Commons.